Speaker summary
⁠84%2 analyzed articles/videos330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noah Greenwald results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Slippery Slope, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50.1% saturation with 165.375 hits. Analysis detected 1,146.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 330 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (21,867 of 28,364 speakers). This Noah Greenwald is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Noah Greenwald
Speaker details
Total words: 330
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510022.9% percentile
15.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos330 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.1%50.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 32.5%32.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 17.9%17.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.5%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 5.2%Horn Effect: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.0%Straw Man: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos