Speaker summary
55% 1 analyzed article/video 419.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nirav Patel results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 83 hits . Analysis detected 726.048 faulty-reasoning hits from 419.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,348 of 28,364 speakers). This Nirav Patel is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group. Nirav Patel
Speaker details
Total words: 419.5
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.1% percentile 7.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos419.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.6% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst