Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video390 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Jackson results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Actor-Observer Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 431 faulty-reasoning hits from 390 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,211 of 28,364 speakers). This Nicole Jackson is better (less manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group.
Nicole Jackson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠5%Nicole Jackson (selected)7%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 390
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751004.1% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos390 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.5%8.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Middle Ground: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos