Speaker summary
⁠47%4 analyzed articles/videos1,054 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Grajewski results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 159.601 hits. Analysis detected 1,701.863 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,054 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,989 of 28,364 speakers). This Nicole Grajewski is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group.
Nicole Grajewski
Speaker details
Total words: 1,054
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.3% percentile
3.9% BS Score4 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 6.6%6.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos