Author summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 6,144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maziar Motamedi results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 3,573 hits . Analysis detected 34,140 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,688 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,853 of 6,628 authors). This Maziar Motamedi is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group. Maziar Motamedi
Author details
Total words: 36,688
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score9 analyzed articles36.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst