Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Calaway results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Burden of Proof, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 35.4% saturation with 53.424 hits. Analysis detected 234.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 146 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (30,045 of 38,689 speakers). This Nicole Calaway is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Nicole Calaway
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠23%Nicole Calaway (selected)15%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 146
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.3% percentile
14.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos146 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.8%10.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 14.9%14.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.8%16.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate