Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video283 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nico Ruderman results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 769.549 faulty-reasoning hits from 283 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,424 of 28,364 speakers). This Nico Ruderman is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group.
Nico Ruderman
Speaker details
Total words: 283
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
025507510010.4% percentile
9.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos283 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.8%20.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos