Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video116.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Nurse results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 80.7% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 475.487 faulty-reasoning hits from 116.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,962 of 28,364 speakers). This Nick Nurse is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Nick Nurse
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 116.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
39.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos116.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 80.7%80.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 59.7%59.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 58.0%58.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 19.3%19.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 80.7%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 59.7%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 58.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos