Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video46.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Fox results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 175 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,520 of 28,364 speakers). This Nick Fox is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Nick Fox
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 46.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.5% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos