Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Cerbone results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 36% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 378 faulty-reasoning hits from 190 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (25,158 of 28,364 speakers). This Nick Cerbone is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
Nick Cerbone
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠12%Nick Cerbone (selected)10%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 190
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510011.3% percentile
10.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos190 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 36.0%36.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.9%20.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos