Speaker summary
52% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,630.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Brown results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Genetic Fallacy , and Self-Serving Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 204 hits . Analysis detected 2,233.2 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,630.667 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 1% (25,934 of 26,155 speakers). This Nick Brown is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group. Nick Brown
Speaker details
Total words: 1,630.667
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score8 analyzed videos1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst