Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas Poche results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Straw Man, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 223.351 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,011 of 28,364 speakers). This Nicholas Poche is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Nicholas Poche
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.8% percentile
68.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos64 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 86.5%86.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.0%27.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Straw Man: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 86.5%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos