Speaker summary
81% 1 analyzed article/video 339.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas Holmes results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Begging the Question , and Optimism Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 33.7% saturation with 114.39 hits . Analysis detected 680.34 faulty-reasoning hits from 339.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.1% and a BS Rank of 25% (21,384 of 28,364 speakers). This Nicholas Holmes is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group. Nicholas Holmes
Speaker details
Total words: 339.5
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.6% percentile 16.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos339.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 42.1% 42.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 42.5% 42.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 33.7% 33.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 18.1% 18.1% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 33.7%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst