Author summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 954 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grant Stringer results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 293 hits . Analysis detected 2,563 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,862 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,552 of 6,628 authors). This Grant Stringer is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Grant Stringer
Author details
Total words: 2,862
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.5% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 7.5% 7.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst