Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video106 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nica Meiloch-Blinn results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 43.5% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 193.614 faulty-reasoning hits from 106 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,672 of 28,364 speakers). This Nica Meiloch-Blinn is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Nica Meiloch-Blinn
Speaker details
Total words: 106
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.3% percentile
37.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos106 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 58.1%58.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 43.5%43.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.1%23.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 58.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 43.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos