Speaker summary
ā 81%1 analyzed article/video283 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nic Robertson results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 53.9% saturation with 152.639 hits. Analysis detected 530.538 faulty-reasoning hits from 283 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19% and a BS Rank of ā 31% (19,774 of 28,364 speakers). This Nic Robertson is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Nic Robertson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 31%Nic Robertson (selected)20%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 283
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.3% percentile
19.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos283 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 53.9%53.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 16.8%16.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 16.8%16.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 53.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos