Speaker summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 99.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nic Puckrin results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Pessimism Bias , and Slippery Slope , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46.3% saturation with 74 hits . Analysis detected 559.554 faulty-reasoning hits from 99.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22% and a BS Rank of 36% (18,260 of 28,364 speakers). This Nic Puckrin is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group. Nic Puckrin
Speaker details
Total words: 99.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.6% percentile 22.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos99.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 40.6% 40.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 31.9% 31.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 45.6% 45.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 46.3% 46.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 28.3% 28.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 30.4% 30.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 22.8% 22.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Speaker 46.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.6%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 11.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 8.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst