Speaker summary
44% 8 analyzed articles/videos 308 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Police Department results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Anchoring Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 105 hits . Analysis detected 698.958 faulty-reasoning hits from 308 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of 9% (23,912 of 26,053 speakers). This New York Police Department is better (less manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group. New York Police Department
Speaker details
Total words: 308
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.2% percentile 8.6% BS Score8 analyzed videos308 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 17.8% 17.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst