Speaker summary
⁠55%2 analyzed articles/videos136.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Democratic Socialists of America results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.5% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 534.707 faulty-reasoning hits from 136.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,138 of 28,364 speakers). This New York City Democratic Socialists of America is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
New York City Democratic Socialists of America
Speaker details
Total words: 136.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.5% percentile
20.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos136.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 43.0%43.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 40.5%40.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.6%12.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 12.6%12.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Speaker 43.0%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 40.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 6.7%No True Scotsman: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos