Speaker summary
⁠41%3 analyzed articles/videos59.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New England Journal of Medicine results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Circular Reasoning, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 66% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 186 faulty-reasoning hits from 59.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,819 of 28,364 speakers). This New England Journal of Medicine is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
New England Journal of Medicine
Speaker details
Total words: 59.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
30.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos59.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 66.0%66.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 42.7%42.7%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 42.7%, sitewide 0.0%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos