Speaker summary
⁠32%3 analyzed articles/videos56.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Delhi results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 55 faulty-reasoning hits from 56.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,976 of 28,364 speakers). This New Delhi is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
New Delhi
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 56.5
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.6% percentile
18.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos56.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 11.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos