Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nermin Hajrizi results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 154.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,467 of 28,364 speakers). This Nermin Hajrizi is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Nermin Hajrizi
Speaker details
Total words: 50.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.5% percentile
33.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos