Speaker summary
⁠75%2 analyzed articles/videos102.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nelnet results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 68.333 hits. Analysis detected 109.333 faulty-reasoning hits from 102.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (9,516 of 28,364 speakers). This Nelnet is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Nelnet
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 102.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510066.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos102.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos