Speaker summary
⁠72%2 analyzed articles/videos77.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nella McOsker results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 83.8% saturation with 74.613 hits. Analysis detected 367.613 faulty-reasoning hits from 77.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 54.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,717 of 28,364 speakers). This Nella McOsker is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Nella McOsker
Speaker details
Total words: 77.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.8% percentile
54.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos77.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 83.8%83.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 33.8%33.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 33.8%33.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 33.8%33.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 33.8%33.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 17.3%17.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 83.8%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 3.1%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos