Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video89.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nell Gwin results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 65.3% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 293.404 faulty-reasoning hits from 89.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,228 of 28,364 speakers). This Nell Gwin is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Nell Gwin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 89.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
34.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos89.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 53.5%53.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 65.3%65.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 59.5%59.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 53.5%53.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 65.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 59.5%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 53.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 53.5%, sitewide 26.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos