Speaker summary
⁠33%5 analyzed articles/videos150.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NCAA results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 256 faulty-reasoning hits from 150.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (24,223 of 27,582 speakers). This NCAA is better (less manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group.
NCAA
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 150.333
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510012.2% percentile
10.4% BS Score5 analyzed videos150.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos