Speaker summary
80%6 analyzed articles/videos82.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Republican Senatorial Committee results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Straw Man, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 74.9% saturation with 62.515 hits. Analysis detected 316.599 faulty-reasoning hits from 82.333 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 32.5% and a BS Rank of 51% (14,031 of 28,364 speakers). This National Republican Senatorial Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
National Republican Senatorial Committee

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510050.5% percentile
32.5% BS Score6 analyzed videos82.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 74.9%74.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 44.9%44.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 31.4%31.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 44.3%44.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 74.9%, sitewide 26.9%Straw Man: Speaker 44.9%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 44.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 31.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate