Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video20 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Parks Conservation Assn results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Self-Serving Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 20 faulty-reasoning hits from 20 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (2,947 of 28,364 speakers). This National Parks Conservation Assn is worse (more manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group.
National Parks Conservation Assn
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠90%National Parks Conservation Assn (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 20
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

90% percentile
025507510089.6% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos20 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos