Speaker summary
⁠55%2 analyzed articles/videos91 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Council on Social Security results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 146 faulty-reasoning hits from 91 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 41.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,465 of 28,364 speakers). This National Council on Social Security is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
National Council on Social Security
Speaker details
Total words: 91
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.6% percentile
41.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos91 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 39.0%39.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 39.0%39.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.0%39.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos