Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Association of Realtors (NAR) results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 148 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (2,924 of 28,364 speakers). This National Association of Realtors (NAR) is worse (more manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
National Association of Realtors (NAR)
Speaker details
Total words: 37
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

90% percentile
025507510089.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos37 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos