Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video32.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Sayre results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 34.7% saturation with 17 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 32.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,550 of 28,364 speakers). This Nathan Sayre is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Nathan Sayre
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 32.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
33.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos32.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 34.7%34.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 32.6%32.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos