Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video89.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nate Huntington results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 38.2% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 368.276 faulty-reasoning hits from 89.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (12,284 of 25,905 speakers). This Nate Huntington is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Nate Huntington
Speaker details
Total words: 89.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
34.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos89.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 72.4%72.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 41.5%41.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 38.8%38.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 72.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 41.5%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 38.8%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos