Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video57.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natasha Varner results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Quote-first Misdirection, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 77.9% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 85.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,648 of 28,364 speakers). This Natasha Varner is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Natasha Varner
Speaker details
Total words: 57.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.3% percentile
25.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos57.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 77.9%77.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 77.9%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos