Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video145.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natasha Hall results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 36.7% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 392.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 145.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,163 of 28,137 speakers). This Natasha Hall is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Natasha Hall
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 145.333
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
22.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos145.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 43.4%43.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.6%26.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 43.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos