Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NASA representatives results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Quote-first Misdirection, and Anecdotal, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (7,060 of 28,364 speakers). This NASA representatives is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
NASA representatives
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.1% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 86.1%86.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 86.1%86.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 13.9%13.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 86.1%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 86.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos