Speaker summary
⁠32%4 analyzed articles/videos936 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naomi Osaka results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Self-Serving Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 1,001.811 faulty-reasoning hits from 936 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,164 of 28,364 speakers). This Naomi Osaka is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
Naomi Osaka
Speaker details
Total words: 936
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score4 analyzed videos936 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos