Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nanyang Technological University Singapore results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 156 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (2,911 of 28,364 speakers). This Nanyang Technological University Singapore is worse (more manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Nanyang Technological University Singapore
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

90% percentile
025507510089.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos39 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos