Engadget42%

A 10-year sky survey begins filming a 'cosmic movie,' cyborg cockroaches go for a dive and more science stories 14%

By Cheyenne MacDonald24%

7/4/2026, 12:45:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 1,793 faulty-reasoning hits from 922 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (18,927 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the article peer group.

This week marked the beginning of the Vera C. 
Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time, a massive effort to observe the sky that comes more than two decades in the making. 
It could help us to better understand our own solar system and the mysteries of the cosmos, from dark energy and dark matter to the expansion of the universe. 
Read on to learn more about that, plus other science news that grabbed our attention this week. 
The Vera C. 
Rubin Observatory gets to work 
The Vera C. 
Rubin Observatory in Chile, which contains the largest digital camera in the world at 3,200 megapixels, has begun its 10-year survey of the universe. 
Its campaign kicked off on June 30, and for the next decade it will capture a new image roughly every 40 seconds, observing the entire southern sky every few nights. 
A press release announcing its commencement said its observations will "create an ultrawide, ultrahigh-definition time-lapse record of the universe." 
"Today, we begin filming the greatest cosmic movie ever made," Brian Stone of the National Science Foundation said in the announcement. 
The observatory captured its first images last summer in a test run of its capabilities, producing a remarkable look at millions of galaxies and stars, along with thousands of previously unseen asteroids. 
Over the course of its decade-long survey, called the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), it will revisit each point in the sky roughly 800 times, allowing it to record changes and cosmic events. 
Rubin will take about a thousand images per night, amounting to about ten terabytes of data daily. 
"It is embarking on a mission that will redefine modern cosmology and astrophysics," said Darío Gil, Under Secretary for Science at the US Department of Energy. 
Gil added, "By seeking to understand the enigmatic phenomena of dark energy and dark matter, we are not just observing the stars; we are striving to grasp the fundamental laws that govern our existence." 
Diving suits for swimming cyborg cockroaches 
This week in Research That Makes My Skin Crawl, scientists from Nanyang Technological University Singapore and Waseda University announced that they've developed a tiny diving suit that allows cyborg cockroaches to survive swimming underwater for hours at a time. 
If you're wondering why, exactly, roaches need to be borg-ified and forced to swim underwater at all, I'm right there with you. 
According to the team, cyborg insects have potential for use in search and rescue operations, as they can access spaces that would be inaccessible to humans, animals and larger robots. 
Cyborg roaches were recently deployed in the field for the first time to assist with search and rescue efforts after a devastating earthquake in Myanmar this spring. 
A flooded environment would normally prove a no-go for the cyborg roaches, which are living Madagascar hissing cockroaches fitted with electronic controllers. 
The flexible diving suit consists of an oxygen-generation tank, a flexible shell and four silicone supply tubes that are attached to the roaches' spiracles, or the openings that they breathe through. 
The team says these tubes can be removed painlessly afterward without harming the roach. 
In a paper published this week in Nature Communications, the researchers report that the cyborg robots were able to swim underwater for up to 3 hours with this setup in tests. 
NASA picks three companies for 2028 Moon Base deliveries 
Earlier this year, NASA overhauled its plans for lunar exploration, announcing that it was hitting pause on building an orbiting Lunar Gateway space station and would instead build a $20 billion Moon Base. 
The first three missions to deliver payloads to the lunar surface for the eventual Moon Base are scheduled to happen before the end of 2026. 
This week, NASA announced four more missions heading to the moon, these ones scheduled for late 2028. 
The space agency says it's awarded contracts totaling nearly $600 million to Astrobotic, Firefly Aerospace and Intuitive Machines to deliver science payloads for the Moon Base. 
Astrobotic will make two trips to the moon, while the other two companies will each make one. 
All of these deliveries will rely on updated versions of each company's lander designs, building on insights from previous missions under NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program. 
The payloads will be the same for each delivery: a Stereo Camera for Lunar Plume Surface Studies (SCALPSS) to collect landing data, a Laser Retroreflector Array (LRA) for precision in determining the location of spacecraft in lunar orbit or landing on the surface, and a Linear Energy Transfer Spectrometer (LETS) for measuring the energy of incoming space radiation. 
If it seems redundant, well, that's the point. 
"By flying the same science instruments on multiple landers, we will better understand potential hazards during landing and build out a global network of environmental data and location markers on the Moon," said Joel Kearns, deputy associate administrator for exploration, Science Mission Directorate, at NASA Headquarters. 
"It's akin to having weather stations in different locations on Earth. 
These three payloads are flight-proven and their data is critical to supporting safe human exploration of the lunar surface." 
Before you go, be sure to check out these stories too: 
Rocket Lab buys satellite company Iridium to go up against Starlink and Amazon's Leo 
Amazon is ready to deploy the Leo satellite broadband service 
The Space Shuttle Endeavour goes on public display later this year 
NASA mission to rescue the falling Swift observatory has launched 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.9%Cheyenne MacDonald: 1.5%Engadget: 3.1%Confirmation Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%Cheyenne MacDonald: 3.3%Engadget: 3.1%Availability Heuristic8.2%This article: 3.6%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.8%Engadget: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic3.6%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 1.5%Engadget: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Cheyenne MacDonald: 4.7%Engadget: 6.0%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.1%Cheyenne MacDonald: 1.2%Engadget: 0.8%Status Quo Bias4.1%This article: 5.6%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.6%Engadget: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect5.6%This article: 16.8%Cheyenne MacDonald: 6.3%Engadget: 4.6%Optimism Bias16.8%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 2.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Cheyenne MacDonald: 3.8%Engadget: 7.0%Negativity Bias8.1%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 2.9%Engadget: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Cheyenne MacDonald: 4.2%Engadget: 1.9%Halo Effect9.8%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.7%Cheyenne MacDonald: 4.5%Engadget: 1.8%Recency Bias12.7%This article: 1.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.2%Engadget: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.4%Engadget: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.4%Cheyenne MacDonald: 8.7%Engadget: 4.9%Appeal to Authority17.4%This article: 5.1%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.5%Engadget: 1.2%False Dilemma5.1%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 5.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.5%Engadget: 0.1%Circular Reasoning5.0%This article: 3.3%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.8%Engadget: 5.3%Hasty Generalization3.3%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.6%Engadget: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.3%Cheyenne MacDonald: 4.8%Engadget: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion15.3%This article: 4.6%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.8%Engadget: 1.0%Begging the Question4.6%This article: 5.5%Cheyenne MacDonald: 1.4%Engadget: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.5%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.1%Cheyenne MacDonald: 1.6%Engadget: 2.3%Anecdotal12.1%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.5%Cheyenne MacDonald: 1.7%Engadget: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.5%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.2%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.1%Engadget: 0.2%Middle Ground1.2%This article: 2.4%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.3%Engadget: 0.1%Personal Incredulity2.4%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.1%Cheyenne MacDonald: 2.7%Engadget: 2.9%Unattributed Quote9.1%This article: 2.1%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.7%Engadget: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection2.1%This article: 19.7%Cheyenne MacDonald: 10.3%Engadget: 7.5%Biased Writer Voice19.7%This article: 2.6%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.3%Engadget: 1.0%Indoctrination2.6%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheyenne MacDonald: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Cheyenne MacDonald: 1.0%Engadget: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.1%

922 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers43%attributed speech528writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRubin Observatory • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageRubin Observatory • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageBrian Stone • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDarío Gil • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDarío Gil • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageNanyang Technological University Singapore • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageNature Communications • 31 words • 0.0% coverageNASA • 9 words • 100.0% coverageNASA • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageNASA • 17 words • 0.0% coverageNASA • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 58 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageJoel Kearns • 46 words • 0.0% coverageJoel Kearns • 11 words • 100.0% coverageJoel Kearns • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageRocket Lab • 14 words • 100.0% coverageAmazon • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageNASA • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words9.9% of attributed speech55% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+79.4 ptsWriter: 20.6%Nanyang Technological University Singapore: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-11.9 ptsWriter: 11.9%Nanyang Technological University Singapore: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.7 ptsWriter: 5.7%Nanyang Technological University Singapore: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%Nanyang Technological University Singapore: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.