Speaker summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos75.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nancy Keenan results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization and Begging the Question, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 70% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 89 faulty-reasoning hits from 75.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 46.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (13,399 of 37,442 speakers). This Nancy Keenan is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
Nancy Keenan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠65%Nancy Keenan (selected)47%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 75.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.2% percentile
46.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos75.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 70.0%70.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 20.0%20.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 70.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos