Author summary
14%2 analyzed articles/videos1,856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Lutey results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anchoring Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 743 hits. Analysis detected 3,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,918 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 5% (7,888 of 8,267 authors). This Tom Lutey is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group.
Tom Lutey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Jared Counts1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
5%Tom Lutey (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,918
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

5% percentile
02550751004.6% percentile
1.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos