Speaker summary
⁠49%3 analyzed articles/videos337 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nancy Higginbotham results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 77.048 hits. Analysis detected 410.498 faulty-reasoning hits from 337 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (26,091 of 28,364 speakers). This Nancy Higginbotham is better (less manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Nancy Higginbotham
Speaker details
Total words: 337
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751008.0% percentile
8.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos337 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.6%8.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Halo Effect: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos