Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video1,652.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nancy Folbre results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 199.072 hits. Analysis detected 2,096.713 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,652.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,970 of 28,364 speakers). This Nancy Folbre is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group.
Nancy Folbre
Speaker details
Total words: 1,652.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.4% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos