Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video205.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nacho Figueras results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 89.1% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 490 faulty-reasoning hits from 205.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (13,739 of 27,017 speakers). This Nacho Figueras is better (less manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Nacho Figueras
Speaker details
Total words: 205.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.1% percentile
31.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos205.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 89.1%89.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 28.3%28.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 24.7%24.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 10.9%10.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 89.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 7.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 0.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 0.5%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos