Speaker summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video30 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ms Rachel for Littles results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 60 faulty-reasoning hits from 30 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (8,820 of 25,911 speakers). This Ms Rachel for Littles is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Ms Rachel for Littles

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

66% percentile
025507510066.0% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos30 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos