Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mozilla Foundation results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 89% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 346 faulty-reasoning hits from 154 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (13,494 of 26,872 speakers). This Mozilla Foundation is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Mozilla Foundation
Speaker details
Total words: 154
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.8% percentile
32.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos154 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 89.0%89.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 39.0%39.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.4%21.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 89.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos