Speaker summary
⁠91%2 analyzed articles/videos117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monitoring Analytics results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 363 faulty-reasoning hits from 117 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 62.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,861 of 28,364 speakers). This Monitoring Analytics is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Monitoring Analytics
Speaker details
Total words: 117
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.8% percentile
62.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos117 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 73.5%73.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 63.3%63.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 36.8%36.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.8%36.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 73.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 63.3%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos