President Trump expands AI data center ‘ratepayer protection pledge’ to include state governors and utility companies  White House claims this will make electricity more affordable 79%

By Jowi Morales76%

7/24/2026, 4:42:41 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 175 hits. Analysis detected 1,545 faulty-reasoning hits from 721 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of 79% (4,751 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the article peer group.

23 state governors and 187 utility companies and data center developers have signed President Donald Trump’s “ratepayer protection pledge,” which is Washington’s way of trying to control spiraling electricity costs driven by the massive power demand of AI data centers. 
According to The Associated Press , some of the signers include utility companies NextEra Energy, Duke Energy, American Electric Power, Southern Co., and Pacific Gas & Electric, and data center developers Equinix, Digital Realty, and Prologis. 
Trump first revealed this promise in late February during the State of the Union address and then hosted some of the biggest AI hyperscalers  including Meta, Amazon, and OpenAI  in the White House a week later to force them to spend on their own power requirements. 
This was supposed to help bring electricity costs down, with Energy Secretary Christ Wright saying back in March that it “will deliver more affordable, reliable, and secure energy for the American people.” 
The president repeated this promise during the event, saying, “Electricity bills for American families will actually come down. 
They’re going to have a lot of electricity left over, and they’ll put that into the grid.” 
Unfortunately, the March promise had little to no effect on electricity rates across the country at the moment. 
Despite the White House’s promises that the pledge would lower utility bills, PJM Interconnection, the nation’s largest power grid operator, slapped Maryland with a $2-billion bill for upgrading its grid to accommodate out-of-state AI data centers. 
Monitoring Analytics, an independent watchdog monitoring PJM Interconnection, also said that the 75.5% increase in power costs in the U.S.’s largest power region has been directly caused by data centers . 
It’s unclear if these cost increases are the long-term effects of the AI build out even before the White House pledge, but it seems the administration is doubling down on it by asking states, utility companies, and data center developers to commit to it, too. 
Trump has been pushing for the acceleration of the adoption of AI tools and the infrastructure needed to support them, believing that it needs to win in the “AI race” to maintain its global supremacy, especially as China is neck-and-neck with the U.S. when it comes to the technology. 
However, the American public is pushing back against these developments, especially as issues impacting electricity costs, water quality, noise pollution, and more that were caused by data centers are widely reported. 
It has gotten to the point that several jurisdictions have applied temporary bans on data center developments , including Seattle (which plays host to Amazon and Microsoft) and the state of New York . 
These developments threaten to derail the current administration’s AI policy, which has ordered grid operators to expedite AI data center applications . 
The ratepayer protection pledge will supposedly allow the U.S. to have its data centers without punishing the common American with excessive electricity cost increases, but its critics say that it’s just a promise and cannot be legally enforced. 
The Associated Press says that California is trying to pass legislation that will codify these promises into law. 
Oregon is the only state at the moment to have passed a law that forces developments that use more than 20 megawatts of power to pay their fair share. 
The POWER Act, which was passed in April 2025  almost a full year before Trump announced the ratepayer protection pledge  forces the power bills of large electricity consumers to “reflect the true costs of their electric service.” 
Because of this, Portland General Electric (PGE), the state’s largest power supplier, has increased the data center power bills by 30% while also cutting residential costs by 1.3%. 
It’s unclear if any of the states that have signed the pledge have similar legislation underway, or what steps the data center developers will take to follow through on their promises. 
Still, the U.S. president is adamant that states should support data center development within their borders. 
“You have to convince your community. 
You can’t fight it. 
You have to go with it,” Trump said. 
“If you don’t take all that money, somebody else is going to take it. 
You might as well do it yourselves.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.1%Jowi Morales: 4.5%Tom's Hardware: 3.8%Confirmation Bias11.1%This article: 5.4%Jowi Morales: 2.5%Tom's Hardware: 2.3%Anchoring Bias5.4%This article: 13.2%Jowi Morales: 4.9%Tom's Hardware: 3.5%Availability Heuristic13.2%This article: 9.7%Jowi Morales: 1.5%Tom's Hardware: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic9.7%This article: 2.5%Jowi Morales: 0.7%Tom's Hardware: 0.5%Hindsight Bias2.5%This article: 6.2%Jowi Morales: 3.4%Tom's Hardware: 3.5%Overconfidence Bias6.2%This article: 3.6%Jowi Morales: 12.9%Tom's Hardware: 9.2%Framing Effect3.6%This article: 3.7%Jowi Morales: 2.6%Tom's Hardware: 0.9%Loss Aversion3.7%This article: 4.0%Jowi Morales: 1.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.7%Status Quo Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.1%Tom's Hardware: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.5%Jowi Morales: 6.9%Tom's Hardware: 6.0%Optimism Bias3.5%This article: 13.7%Jowi Morales: 2.5%Tom's Hardware: 2.0%Pessimism Bias13.7%This article: 24.3%Jowi Morales: 13.7%Tom's Hardware: 6.5%Negativity Bias24.3%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 1.3%Tom's Hardware: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.8%Tom's Hardware: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 13.5%Jowi Morales: 0.6%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias13.5%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 1.4%Tom's Hardware: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.3%Tom's Hardware: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 2.6%Tom's Hardware: 2.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 1.7%Tom's Hardware: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.8%Tom's Hardware: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Jowi Morales: 0.1%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.3%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.5%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.9%Jowi Morales: 6.7%Tom's Hardware: 5.4%Appeal to Authority6.9%This article: 4.6%Jowi Morales: 4.0%Tom's Hardware: 2.0%False Dilemma4.6%This article: 3.1%Jowi Morales: 1.4%Tom's Hardware: 1.0%Slippery Slope3.1%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.2%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.0%Jowi Morales: 8.8%Tom's Hardware: 6.1%Hasty Generalization11.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.3%Tom's Hardware: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.3%Jowi Morales: 1.2%Tom's Hardware: 1.1%Bandwagon4.3%This article: 0.8%Jowi Morales: 7.1%Tom's Hardware: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion0.8%This article: 2.5%Jowi Morales: 1.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.8%Begging the Question2.5%This article: 21.2%Jowi Morales: 6.3%Tom's Hardware: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)21.2%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.2%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.7%Jowi Morales: 1.6%Tom's Hardware: 0.8%Burden of Proof6.7%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.4%Tom's Hardware: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.4%Jowi Morales: 0.8%Tom's Hardware: 0.6%Composition/Division5.4%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 3.5%Tom's Hardware: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.4%Jowi Morales: 3.5%Tom's Hardware: 3.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.4%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.1%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.3%Jowi Morales: 0.5%Tom's Hardware: 0.2%Special Pleading5.3%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.2%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.5%Jowi Morales: 3.3%Tom's Hardware: 2.4%Unattributed Quote2.5%This article: 2.5%Jowi Morales: 2.5%Tom's Hardware: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection2.5%This article: 16.5%Jowi Morales: 8.9%Tom's Hardware: 7.1%Biased Writer Voice16.5%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 2.2%Tom's Hardware: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.5%Tom's Hardware: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 0.0%Tom's Hardware: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jowi Morales: 6.8%Tom's Hardware: 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

721 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers17%attributed speech597writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageChrist Wright • 32 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 18 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageThe Associated Press • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
74 attributed words60% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Unattributed Quote+24.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 24.3%24.3%Quote-first Misdirection+24.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 24.3%24.3%Biased Writer Voice-19.9 ptsWriter: 19.9%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.