Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monisha Jackson-James results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 78 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,510 of 28,364 speakers). This Monisha Jackson-James is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Monisha Jackson-James
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.6% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos39 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos