Speaker summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos176.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammad Mokhber results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Ad Hominem, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 37.9% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 468.085 faulty-reasoning hits from 176.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (24,108 of 28,364 speakers). This Mohammad Mokhber is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
Mohammad Mokhber
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510015.0% percentile
11.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos176.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.9%37.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.9%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos