Speaker summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos94.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammad Mannan Raisi results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, In-Group Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 106.5 hits. Analysis detected 409.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 94.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 44.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,910 of 28,364 speakers). This Mohammad Mannan Raisi is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Mohammad Mannan Raisi
Speaker details
Total words: 94.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.5% percentile
44.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos94.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 63.4%63.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 47.5%47.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 47.5%47.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.3%18.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 63.4%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 47.5%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 47.5%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos